HG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of 54.15%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.84%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.128%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $781.7M, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $325M. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M is lower than Assured Guaranty's net income of $176M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.89x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 10.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.90x versus 4.80x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Conduit Holdings has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of --. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83% beat Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand Conduit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conduit Holdings offers a yield of 5.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings pays out 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $781.7M, which are larger than Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M is higher than Conduit Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.89x while Conduit Holdings's PE ratio is 7.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.90x versus 1.32x for Conduit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of 4.96%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $398.04 which suggests that it could grow by 18.61%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.791%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $781.7M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.89x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.90x versus 0.83x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of -130.67%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -135.59%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.91%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.533%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $781.7M, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.89x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.90x versus 1.81x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.