V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 53.83% compared to Visa's net margin of 90.34%. Visa's return on equity of 50.59% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 19.66%.

Visa has a consensus price target of $376.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $66.08 which suggests that it could grow by 58.76%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Visa.

Visa has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $1B. Visa's net income of $5.1B is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $916M. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.33x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 26.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.18x versus 12.93x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of 53.83% compared to Visa's net margin of 44.63%. Visa's return on equity of 50.59% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81%.

Visa has a consensus price target of $376.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $618.26 which suggests that it could grow by 12.8%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Visa has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.352%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Visa's net income of $5.1B is higher than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.33x while Mastercard's PE ratio is 39.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.18x versus 18.04x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 53.83% compared to Visa's net margin of 13.4%. Visa's return on equity of 50.59% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 20.14%.

Visa has a consensus price target of $376.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $93.20 which suggests that it could grow by 43.45%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Visa.

Visa has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.467%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Visa's net income of $5.1B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.33x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.18x versus 2.13x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wells Fargo & has a net margin of 53.83% compared to Visa's net margin of 24.92%. Visa's return on equity of 50.59% beat Wells Fargo &'s return on equity of 10.79%.

Visa has a consensus price target of $376.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand Wells Fargo & has an analysts' consensus of $83.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.75%. Given that Wells Fargo & has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Wells Fargo & is more attractive than Visa.

Visa has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wells Fargo & has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.021%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Wells Fargo & offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Wells Fargo & pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are smaller than Wells Fargo & quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Visa's net income of $5.1B is higher than Wells Fargo &'s net income of $5.1B. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.33x while Wells Fargo &'s PE ratio is 13.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.18x versus 3.03x for Wells Fargo &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.