MA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 31.46%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 12.29%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $621.58, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $592.21 which suggests that it could fall by -5.19%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.374%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $15.1B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.93x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 14.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.06x versus 3.79x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 44.79%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $621.58, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $25.38 which suggests that it could grow by 49.35%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.909, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 290.949%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of -$90.6M. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.93x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 4.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.06x versus 6.66x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 16.52%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 22.25%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $621.58, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $82.06 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.828%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.93x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 15.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.06x versus 2.26x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 47.71%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.81%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $621.58, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $382.44 which suggests that it could grow by 7.58%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.701%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Visa offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Visa's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.93x while Visa's PE ratio is 35.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.06x versus 18.87x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.