MA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 44.28% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 23.55%. Mastercard's return on equity of 172.76% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 7.61%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $564.64, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $45.24 which suggests that it could grow by 15.93%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $637M. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $150M. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.26x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 66.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.21x versus 14.38x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of 44.28% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 1.53%. Mastercard's return on equity of 172.76% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $564.64, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $33.63 which suggests that it could grow by 50.65%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.441%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.26x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.21x versus 5.81x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 44.28% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 12.87%. Mastercard's return on equity of 172.76% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 21.65%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $564.64, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $93.69 which suggests that it could grow by 7.87%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.017%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.28% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.26x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 20.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.21x versus 2.92x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 44.28% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 55.3%. Mastercard's return on equity of 172.76% beat Visa's return on equity of 49.9%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $564.64, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $331.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.16%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.804%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Visa offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Mastercard pays 19.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Visa's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.26x while Visa's PE ratio is 32.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.21x versus 17.99x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.