RCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carnival has a net margin of 22.74% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 5.1%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.09% beat Carnival's return on equity of 25.06%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $249.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $29.31 which suggests that it could grow by 21.48%. Given that Carnival has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Carnival is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.592, which suggesting that the stock is 159.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carnival has a beta of 2.645, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.549%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Carnival offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carnival pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Carnival quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $1.1B is higher than Carnival's net income of $303M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Carnival's PE ratio is 17.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.93x versus 1.29x for Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a net margin of 22.74% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 12%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.09% beat Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of --.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $249.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand Hilton Worldwide Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $241.88 which suggests that it could fall by -0.69%. Given that Royal Caribbean Group has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Royal Caribbean Group is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.592, which suggesting that the stock is 159.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.553%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays out 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $1.1B is higher than Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $344M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Hilton Worldwide Holdings's PE ratio is 52.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.93x versus 5.61x for Hilton Worldwide Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a net margin of 22.74% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 16.92%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.09% beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 93.73%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $249.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $30.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.94%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.592, which suggesting that the stock is 159.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.18%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $1.1B is higher than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $474.9M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's PE ratio is 23.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.93x versus 1.29x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travel+Leisure has a net margin of 22.74% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 9.77%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.09% beat Travel+Leisure's return on equity of --.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $249.70, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand Travel+Leisure has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.22%. Given that Travel+Leisure has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Travel+Leisure is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.592, which suggesting that the stock is 159.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.587%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Travel+Leisure offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure pays out 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues of $993M. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $1.1B is higher than Travel+Leisure's net income of $97M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.47x while Travel+Leisure's PE ratio is 8.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 3.93x versus 0.96x for Travel+Leisure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.