NCLH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carnival has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of -1.34%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 84.71% beat Carnival's return on equity of 25.32%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 37.37%. On the other hand Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $28.46 which suggests that it could grow by 22.25%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Carnival, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Carnival.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carnival has a beta of 2.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.996%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carnival offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carnival pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Carnival quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of -$40.3M is higher than Carnival's net income of -$78M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Carnival's PE ratio is 15.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 0.96x versus 1.23x for Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Caesars Entertainment has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of -4.12%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 84.71% beat Caesars Entertainment's return on equity of -5.31%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 37.37%. On the other hand Caesars Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $42.87 which suggests that it could grow by 62.07%. Given that Caesars Entertainment has higher upside potential than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, analysts believe Caesars Entertainment is more attractive than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 2.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.053%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caesars Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caesars Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Caesars Entertainment quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of -$40.3M is higher than Caesars Entertainment's net income of -$115M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Caesars Entertainment's PE ratio is 10.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 0.96x versus 0.50x for Caesars Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGM Resorts International has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of 3.47%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 84.71% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 17.74%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 37.37%. On the other hand MGM Resorts International has an analysts' consensus of $46.03 which suggests that it could grow by 36.97%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than MGM Resorts International, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than MGM Resorts International.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.761, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.117%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MGM Resorts International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGM Resorts International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of -$40.3M is lower than MGM Resorts International's net income of $148.6M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while MGM Resorts International's PE ratio is 14.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 0.96x versus 0.59x for MGM Resorts International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of 18.26%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 84.71% beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.91%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 37.37%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $269.26 which suggests that it could grow by 2.63%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.958%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $4B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of -$40.3M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $730M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 21.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 0.96x versus 4.29x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.