O Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a net margin of 18.1% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 43.38%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.51% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.2%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.74, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Essential Properties Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $35.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.58%. Given that Essential Properties Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Essential Properties Realty Trust is more attractive than Realty Income.

Realty Income has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.313%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.77%. Essential Properties Realty Trust offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 98.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Properties Realty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Realty Income's is not.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Essential Properties Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $129.4M. Realty Income's net income of $249.8M is higher than Essential Properties Realty Trust's net income of $56.1M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.05x while Essential Properties Realty Trust's PE ratio is 27.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 8.97x versus 12.07x for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Medical REIT has a net margin of 18.1% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 10.29%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.51% beat Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.4%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.74, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Global Medical REIT has an analysts' consensus of $10.16 which suggests that it could grow by 47.74%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Realty Income.

Realty Income has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.918%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.77%. Global Medical REIT offers a yield of 12.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Medical REIT pays out 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Realty Income's net income of $249.8M is higher than Global Medical REIT's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.05x while Global Medical REIT's PE ratio is 226.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 8.97x versus 3.26x for Global Medical REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 18.1% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 24.75%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.51% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 5.14%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.74, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $23.99 which suggests that it could grow by 11.78%. Given that Realty Income has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe Realty Income is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

Realty Income has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.414%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.77%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $536.6M. Realty Income's net income of $249.8M is higher than Kimco Realty's net income of $132.8M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.05x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 27.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 8.97x versus 6.99x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 18.1% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 4.81%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.51% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.74, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.94%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Realty Income.

Realty Income has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.77%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Realty Income's is not.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Realty Income's net income of $249.8M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.05x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 18.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 8.97x versus 0.64x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.