O Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a net margin of 14.89% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 46.26%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.28% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.24%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.75, signalling upside risk potential of 10.66%. On the other hand Essential Properties Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $35.89 which suggests that it could grow by 13.13%. Given that Essential Properties Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Essential Properties Realty Trust is more attractive than Realty Income.

Realty Income has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.427%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.65%. Essential Properties Realty Trust offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 98.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Properties Realty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Realty Income's is not.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Essential Properties Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $119.7M. Realty Income's net income of $199.6M is higher than Essential Properties Realty Trust's net income of $55.4M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.94x while Essential Properties Realty Trust's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 9.14x versus 12.50x for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Medical REIT has a net margin of 14.89% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 8.1%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.28% beat Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.14%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.75, signalling upside risk potential of 10.66%. On the other hand Global Medical REIT has an analysts' consensus of $10.68 which suggests that it could grow by 27.58%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Realty Income.

Realty Income has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.277%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.65%. Global Medical REIT offers a yield of 10.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Medical REIT pays out 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues of $35M. Realty Income's net income of $199.6M is higher than Global Medical REIT's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.94x while Global Medical REIT's PE ratio is 837.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 9.14x versus 3.99x for Global Medical REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 14.89% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 31.6%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.28% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.75, signalling upside risk potential of 10.66%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $24.79 which suggests that it could grow by 19.45%. Given that Kimco Realty has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Kimco Realty is more attractive than Realty Income.

Realty Income has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.568%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.65%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $525.4M. Realty Income's net income of $199.6M is higher than Kimco Realty's net income of $166M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.94x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 37.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 9.14x versus 6.85x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 14.89% compared to Realty Income's net margin of 4.81%. Realty Income's return on equity of 2.28% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Realty Income has a consensus price target of $61.75, signalling upside risk potential of 10.66%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 21.02%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Realty Income.

Realty Income has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Realty Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.65%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Realty Income pays 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Realty Income's is not.

Realty Income quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Realty Income's net income of $199.6M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Realty Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.94x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 20.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Realty Income is 9.14x versus 0.70x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.