STRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bluerock Homes Trust has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of 18.36%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 6.55% beat Bluerock Homes Trust's return on equity of -2.57%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.83%. On the other hand Bluerock Homes Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Bluerock Homes Trust, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Bluerock Homes Trust.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bluerock Homes Trust has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. Bluerock Homes Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 115.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluerock Homes Trust pays out -0.5% of its earnings as a dividend.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $29.5M, which are larger than Bluerock Homes Trust quarterly revenues of $12.7M. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $944K is lower than Bluerock Homes Trust's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Bluerock Homes Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.62x versus 1.10x for Bluerock Homes Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lineage has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of -0.31%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 6.55% beat Lineage's return on equity of --.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.83%. On the other hand Lineage has an analysts' consensus of $83.25 which suggests that it could grow by 42.16%. Given that Lineage has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe Lineage is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lineage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. Lineage offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 115.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Lineage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $29.5M, which are smaller than Lineage quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $944K is higher than Lineage's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Lineage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.62x versus -- for Lineage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of 77.54%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 6.55% beat Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 13.55%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.83%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has an analysts' consensus of $18.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.51%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance offers a yield of 11.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 115.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays out 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $29.5M, which are larger than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues of $14.5M. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $944K is lower than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $11.2M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's PE ratio is 8.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.62x versus 5.59x for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of 47.74%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 6.55% beat Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.93%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.83%. On the other hand Seven Hills Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 13.49%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Seven Hills Realty Trust, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Seven Hills Realty Trust.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.396%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.9%. Seven Hills Realty Trust offers a yield of 10.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 115.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays out 80.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Strawberry Fields REIT's is not.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $29.5M, which are larger than Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $944K is lower than Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $3.5M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Seven Hills Realty Trust's PE ratio is 10.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.62x versus 5.99x for Seven Hills Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.