MSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 26.77%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -66.89%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.68, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 127.27%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.109%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.8M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.92x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 0.12x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommScope Holding has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 70.49%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat CommScope Holding's return on equity of --.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.68, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand CommScope Holding has an analysts' consensus of $4.80 which suggests that it could fall by -15.79%. Given that Motorola Solutions has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Motorola Solutions is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.369%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. CommScope Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. CommScope Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than CommScope Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is lower than CommScope Holding's net income of $784M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.92x while CommScope Holding's PE ratio is 2.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 0.28x for CommScope Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 4.46%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.68, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $11.58 which suggests that it could grow by 33.3%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.038%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Harmonic's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.92x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 1.47x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 6.85%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of 0.73%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.68, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.26 which suggests that it could grow by 32.57%. Given that Viavi Solutions has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Viavi Solutions is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.43%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $284.8M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Viavi Solutions's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.92x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is 462.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.33x versus 1.98x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.