HLIT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airgain has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -12.87%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat Airgain's return on equity of -25.22%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 19.17%. On the other hand Airgain has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 96.34%. Given that Airgain has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Airgain is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airgain has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.811%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Airgain offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Airgain pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than Airgain quarterly revenues of $12M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is higher than Airgain's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Airgain's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 0.74x for Airgain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BK Technologies has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 20.4%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 34.24%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 19.17%. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.67%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than BK Technologies.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.592%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $17.9M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is higher than BK Technologies's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 20.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 2.21x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -38.51%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -65.2%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 19.17%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 228.95%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.03200000000001%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.6M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$48.7M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 0.09x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 6.85%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of 0.73%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 19.17%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.26 which suggests that it could grow by 29.35%. Given that Viavi Solutions has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Viavi Solutions is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.245%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $284.8M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is lower than Viavi Solutions's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is 474.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 2.03x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.