MLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of --. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 23.23% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $631.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.41%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $3.63 which suggests that it could grow by 123.77%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.892%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $363M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.14x versus 3,671.04x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of -30.05%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 23.23% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -16.85%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $631.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.41%. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $2.63 which suggests that it could grow by 59.09%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.846%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -12.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $363M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of -$727.5K. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.14x versus 17.47x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of 37.3%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 23.23% beat United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $631.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.41%. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Martin Marietta Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Martin Marietta Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.993%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. United States Lime & Minerals offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues of $89.4M. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $363M is higher than United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while United States Lime & Minerals's PE ratio is 35.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.14x versus 11.41x for United States Lime & Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vulcan Materials has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of 10.36%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 23.23% beat Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.1%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $631.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.41%. On the other hand Vulcan Materials has an analysts' consensus of $292.42 which suggests that it could grow by 8.26%. Given that Martin Marietta Materials has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials, analysts believe Martin Marietta Materials is more attractive than Vulcan Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.622%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Vulcan Materials offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials pays out 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues of $2B. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $363M is higher than Vulcan Materials's net income of $207.6M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while Vulcan Materials's PE ratio is 42.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 5.14x versus 4.86x for Vulcan Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.