USLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials has a net margin of 37.3% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of -40.55%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52% beat MP Materials's return on equity of -4.9%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MP Materials has an analysts' consensus of $23.09 which suggests that it could grow by 10.28%. Given that MP Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe MP Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 6.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. MP Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $89.4M, which are larger than MP Materials quarterly revenues of $62.9M. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M is higher than MP Materials's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.01x while MP Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 11.41x versus 19.73x for MP Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 37.3% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of --. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $3.63 which suggests that it could grow by 123.77%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 6.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.892%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $89.4M, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.01x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 11.41x versus 3,671.04x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 37.3% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of -30.05%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -16.85%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $2.63 which suggests that it could grow by 59.09%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 6.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.846%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -12.41% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $89.4M, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $2.4M. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of -$727.5K. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.01x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 11.41x versus 17.47x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vulcan Materials has a net margin of 37.3% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of 10.36%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52% beat Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.1%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vulcan Materials has an analysts' consensus of $292.42 which suggests that it could grow by 8.26%. Given that Vulcan Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Vulcan Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 6.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.622%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Vulcan Materials offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials pays out 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $89.4M, which are smaller than Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues of $2B. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M is lower than Vulcan Materials's net income of $207.6M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.01x while Vulcan Materials's PE ratio is 42.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 11.41x versus 4.86x for Vulcan Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.