FLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 6.22%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.5%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.7%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $485.40 which suggests that it could grow by 3.66%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than EMCOR Group, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than EMCOR Group.

Fluor has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.749%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.00x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 20.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.44x versus 1.45x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 13.76%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.7%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.86%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.18%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.00x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 11.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.44x versus 0.95x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of -0.75%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.7%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.35%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.161%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.00x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 166.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.44x versus 0.37x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 9.16%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.7%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $216.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.05%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.298%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $430.9M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.00x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 21.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.44x versus 2.74x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.