FLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 43.73% compared to Fluor's net margin of 9.72%. Fluor's return on equity of 84.64% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 50.26%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 84.95%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.726, which suggesting that the stock is 72.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.07%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $202.8M. Fluor's net income of $1.9B is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.84x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 9.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.37x versus 0.70x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec has a net margin of 43.73% compared to Fluor's net margin of 2.2%. Fluor's return on equity of 84.64% beat MasTec's return on equity of 5.83%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 50.26%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $168.57 which suggests that it could grow by 44.66%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than MasTec.

Fluor has a beta of 1.726, which suggesting that the stock is 72.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.772%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than MasTec quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Fluor's net income of $1.9B is higher than MasTec's net income of $74.7M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.84x while MasTec's PE ratio is 56.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.37x versus 0.75x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 43.73% compared to Fluor's net margin of 3.11%. Fluor's return on equity of 84.64% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -1.28%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 50.26%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 107.55%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.726, which suggesting that the stock is 72.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.238%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.9M. Fluor's net income of $1.9B is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.84x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.37x versus 0.23x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 43.73% compared to Fluor's net margin of 22.7%. Fluor's return on equity of 84.64% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 50.26%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $198.33 which suggests that it could grow by 68.35%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.726, which suggesting that the stock is 72.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.378%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $498.8M. Fluor's net income of $1.9B is higher than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.84x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 14.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.37x versus 1.73x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.