STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of -6.05%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat Fluor's return on equity of 64.65%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $216.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.72%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $46.25 which suggests that it could fall by -4.42%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.942%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4B. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is higher than Fluor's net income of -$241M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.87x while Fluor's PE ratio is 4.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.01x versus 0.51x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 13.76%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $216.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.72%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.87%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.383%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.87x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 11.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.01x versus 0.98x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of -0.75%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $216.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.72%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 29.97%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.475%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.87x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 171.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.01x versus 0.38x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 0.74%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $216.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.72%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $109.97 which suggests that it could grow by 4.42%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.942%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $430.9M, which are smaller than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $571.7M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.87x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 90.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 3.01x versus 2.59x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.