STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 43.73%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat Fluor's return on equity of 84.64%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.35%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $52.50 which suggests that it could grow by 50.26%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.561%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is lower than Fluor's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.23x while Fluor's PE ratio is 2.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 1.73x versus 0.37x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 9.72%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.35%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 84.95%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.07%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $202.8M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.23x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 9.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 1.73x versus 0.70x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 2.2%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat MasTec's return on equity of 5.83%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.35%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $168.57 which suggests that it could grow by 44.66%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than MasTec.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.772%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is higher than MasTec's net income of $74.7M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.23x while MasTec's PE ratio is 56.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 1.73x versus 0.75x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 3.11%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -1.28%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.35%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 107.55%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.238%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.9M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.23x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 1.73x versus 0.23x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.