FIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Akamai Technologies has a net margin of 10.81% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 13.72%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 8.52% beat Akamai Technologies's return on equity of 10.67%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.28, signalling upside risk potential of 10.12%. On the other hand Akamai Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $102.90 which suggests that it could grow by 28.97%. Given that Akamai Technologies has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Akamai Technologies is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Akamai Technologies has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.952%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Akamai Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Akamai Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Akamai Technologies quarterly revenues of $1B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $281M is higher than Akamai Technologies's net income of $139.9M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.25x while Akamai Technologies's PE ratio is 24.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.35x versus 3.09x for Akamai Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a net margin of 10.81% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 8.96%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 8.52% beat Broadridge Financial Solutions's return on equity of 34.7%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.28, signalling upside risk potential of 10.12%. On the other hand Broadridge Financial Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $243.93 which suggests that it could grow by 2.61%. Given that Fidelity National Information Services has higher upside potential than Broadridge Financial Solutions, analysts believe Fidelity National Information Services is more attractive than Broadridge Financial Solutions.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.92%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Broadridge Financial Solutions offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 52.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Broadridge Financial Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $281M is higher than Broadridge Financial Solutions's net income of $142.4M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.25x while Broadridge Financial Solutions's PE ratio is 37.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.35x versus 4.22x for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fortinet has a net margin of 10.81% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 31.7%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 8.52% beat Fortinet's return on equity of 417.67%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.28, signalling upside risk potential of 10.12%. On the other hand Fortinet has an analysts' consensus of $112.71 which suggests that it could grow by 10.72%. Given that Fortinet has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Fortinet is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortinet has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.456%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Fortinet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortinet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Fortinet quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $281M is lower than Fortinet's net income of $526.2M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.25x while Fortinet's PE ratio is 45.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.35x versus 13.19x for Fortinet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xerox Holdings has a net margin of 10.81% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of -1.3%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 8.52% beat Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -62.39%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.28, signalling upside risk potential of 10.12%. On the other hand Xerox Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.97 which suggests that it could grow by 133.49%. Given that Xerox Holdings has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Xerox Holdings is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.239%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Xerox Holdings offers a yield of 20.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Xerox Holdings pays out -10.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $281M is higher than Xerox Holdings's net income of -$21M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.25x while Xerox Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.35x versus 0.09x for Xerox Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.