EMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of -10.34%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.92% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $114.91, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.85%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Eastman Chemical's net income of $330M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.09x versus 0.21x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DuPont de Nemours has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of -3.82%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.92% beat DuPont de Nemours's return on equity of 2.91%.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $114.91, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand DuPont de Nemours has an analysts' consensus of $97.41 which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than DuPont de Nemours, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than DuPont de Nemours.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DuPont de Nemours has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.398%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. DuPont de Nemours offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. DuPont de Nemours pays out 90.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than DuPont de Nemours quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Eastman Chemical's net income of $330M is higher than DuPont de Nemours's net income of -$118M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while DuPont de Nemours's PE ratio is 44.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.09x versus 2.51x for DuPont de Nemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.06%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.92% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $114.91, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $153.57 which suggests that it could grow by 25.93%. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Nucor.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.84%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Eastman Chemical's net income of $330M is higher than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while Nucor's PE ratio is 14.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.09x versus 0.95x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 5.35%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.92% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $114.91, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.32 which suggests that it could grow by 17.22%. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 41.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Eastman Chemical's net income of $330M is higher than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.33x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.09x versus 1.10x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.