CB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Chubb's net margin of 7.16%. Chubb's return on equity of 15.61% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $301.15, signalling upside risk potential of 11.75%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $223.76 which suggests that it could grow by 18.46%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.975%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Chubb pays 15.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Chubb's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.9B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. Chubb's net income of $2.3B is higher than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.01x versus 0.80x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Chubb's net margin of 44.28%. Chubb's return on equity of 15.61% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 172.76%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $301.15, signalling upside risk potential of 11.75%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $569.12 which suggests that it could grow by 8.47%. Given that Chubb has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Chubb is more attractive than Mastercard.

Chubb has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.625%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Chubb pays 15.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.9B, which are larger than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Chubb's net income of $2.3B is lower than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while Mastercard's PE ratio is 39.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.01x versus 17.96x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Chubb's net margin of 11.84%. Chubb's return on equity of 15.61% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $301.15, signalling upside risk potential of 11.75%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $276.7647 which suggests that it could grow by 13.58%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.864%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Progressive offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. Chubb pays 15.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.9B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Chubb's net income of $2.3B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.01x versus 1.99x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Chubb's net margin of 10.59%. Chubb's return on equity of 15.61% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $301.15, signalling upside risk potential of 11.75%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $263.67 which suggests that it could grow by 10.08%. Given that Chubb has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Chubb is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Chubb has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.297%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Chubb pays 15.44% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.9B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Chubb's net income of $2.3B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.01x versus 1.22x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.