CB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Chubb's net margin of 3.62%. Chubb's return on equity of 12.51% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.26, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $226.59 which suggests that it could grow by 12.14%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.546%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Chubb's net income of $1.3B is higher than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Allstate's PE ratio is 13.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 0.83x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Chubb's net margin of 18.9%. Chubb's return on equity of 12.51% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.26, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $83.72 which suggests that it could grow by 7.23%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.022%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Chubb's net income of $1.3B is higher than Nasdaq's net income of $395M. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 35.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 5.79x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Chubb's net margin of 12.58%. Chubb's return on equity of 12.51% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.26, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $293.8824 which suggests that it could grow by 3.52%. Given that Chubb has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Chubb is more attractive than Progressive.

Chubb has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.748%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Chubb's net income of $1.3B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 2.12x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Chubb's net margin of 3.35%. Chubb's return on equity of 12.51% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.26, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $276.26 which suggests that it could grow by 3.06%. Given that Chubb has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Chubb is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Chubb has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.67%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Chubb's net income of $1.3B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 1.32x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.