APA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 13.05% compared to APA's net margin of 29.06%. APA's return on equity of 15.25% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

APA has a consensus price target of $27.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.91%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $204.31 which suggests that it could grow by 29.69%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

APA has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.902%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. APA pays 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. APA's net income of $354M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.76x versus 3.05x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 13.05% compared to APA's net margin of -1.88%. APA's return on equity of 15.25% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

APA has a consensus price target of $27.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.91%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $58.78 which suggests that it could grow by 20.38%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

APA has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. APA pays 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. APA's net income of $354M is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.76x versus 1.77x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 13.05% compared to APA's net margin of 63.71%. APA's return on equity of 15.25% beat Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.85%.

APA has a consensus price target of $27.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.91%. On the other hand Texas Pacific Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -29.77%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

APA has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.696, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.603%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Texas Pacific Land offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share. APA pays 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues of $185.8M. APA's net income of $354M is higher than Texas Pacific Land's net income of $118.4M. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Texas Pacific Land's PE ratio is 66.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.76x versus 42.58x for Texas Pacific Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 13.05% compared to APA's net margin of 9.39%. APA's return on equity of 15.25% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

APA has a consensus price target of $27.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.91%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $128.98 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

APA has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.351%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. APA pays 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. APA's net income of $354M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.76x versus 1.49x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.