AIZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Assurant's net margin of -2488.52%. Assurant's return on equity of 13.14% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of -9.3%.

Assurant has a consensus price target of $233.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.97%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Assurant has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Assurant is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Assurant has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.910, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.007%.

Assurant has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Assurant pays 20.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assurant quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $392K. Assurant's net income of $146.6M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Assurant's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.53x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assurant is 0.86x versus 1.83x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lemonade has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Assurant's net margin of -41.27%. Assurant's return on equity of 13.14% beat Lemonade's return on equity of -35.7%.

Assurant has a consensus price target of $233.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.97%. On the other hand Lemonade has an analysts' consensus of $30.43 which suggests that it could fall by -27.78%. Given that Assurant has higher upside potential than Lemonade, analysts believe Assurant is more attractive than Lemonade.

Assurant has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lemonade has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Assurant has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Lemonade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Assurant pays 20.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Lemonade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assurant quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Lemonade quarterly revenues of $151.2M. Assurant's net income of $146.6M is higher than Lemonade's net income of -$62.4M. Notably, Assurant's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.53x while Lemonade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assurant is 0.86x versus 5.41x for Lemonade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Assurant's net margin of 5.17%. Assurant's return on equity of 13.14% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.75%.

Assurant has a consensus price target of $233.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.97%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $92.71 which suggests that it could grow by 17.38%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Assurant, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Assurant.

Assurant has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.093%.

Assurant has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Assurant pays 20.51% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assurant quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Assurant's net income of $146.6M is lower than MetLife's net income of $945M. Notably, Assurant's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.53x while MetLife's PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assurant is 0.86x versus 0.76x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Assurant's net margin of -0.43%. Assurant's return on equity of 13.14% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34%.

Assurant has a consensus price target of $233.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.97%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.26%. Given that Assurant has higher upside potential than Trupanion, analysts believe Assurant is more attractive than Trupanion.

Assurant has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.812, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.237%.

Assurant has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Assurant pays 20.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assurant quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $342M. Assurant's net income of $146.6M is higher than Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Assurant's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.53x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assurant is 0.86x versus 1.63x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.