LMND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of -49.56% compared to Lemonade's net margin of 13.04%. Lemonade's return on equity of -32.12% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 31.85%.

Lemonade has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -24.19%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lemonade has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Lemonade is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Lemonade has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.851%.

Lemonade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. Lemonade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lemonade quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Lemonade's net income of -$67.7M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $159.8M. Notably, Lemonade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 39.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lemonade is 5.90x versus 5.96x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hippo Holdings has a net margin of -49.56% compared to Lemonade's net margin of -8.9%. Lemonade's return on equity of -32.12% beat Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -35.13%.

Lemonade has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -24.19%. On the other hand Hippo Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.55%. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Lemonade, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Lemonade.

Lemonade has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lemonade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hippo Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lemonade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hippo Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lemonade quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues of $95.5M. Lemonade's net income of -$67.7M is lower than Hippo Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Lemonade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hippo Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lemonade is 5.90x versus 1.97x for Hippo Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of -49.56% compared to Lemonade's net margin of 7.46%. Lemonade's return on equity of -32.12% beat Root's return on equity of -9.03%.

Lemonade has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -24.19%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.04%. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Lemonade, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Lemonade.

Lemonade has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lemonade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lemonade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lemonade quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $305.7M. Lemonade's net income of -$67.7M is lower than Root's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Lemonade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Root's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lemonade is 5.90x versus 1.06x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of -49.56% compared to Lemonade's net margin of 12.14%. Lemonade's return on equity of -32.12% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6%.

Lemonade has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -24.19%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.75%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Lemonade, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Lemonade.

Lemonade has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lemonade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lemonade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lemonade quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $302M. Lemonade's net income of -$67.7M is lower than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Lemonade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lemonade is 5.90x versus 1.91x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.