ADT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Line Protection Group has a net margin of 10.22% compared to ADT's net margin of 7.75%. ADT's return on equity of 24.01% beat Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of --.

ADT has a consensus price target of $9.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand Blue Line Protection Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ADT has higher upside potential than Blue Line Protection Group, analysts believe ADT is more attractive than Blue Line Protection Group.

ADT has a beta of 1.510, which suggesting that the stock is 50.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 3.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 212.406%.

ADT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Blue Line Protection Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ADT pays 27.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Line Protection Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ADT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ADT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues of $1M. ADT's net income of $127.2M is higher than Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $79.3K. Notably, ADT's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.57x while Blue Line Protection Group's PE ratio is 16.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADT is 1.34x versus 0.20x for Blue Line Protection Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The GEO Group has a net margin of 10.22% compared to ADT's net margin of 4.36%. ADT's return on equity of 24.01% beat The GEO Group's return on equity of 3.23%.

ADT has a consensus price target of $9.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand The GEO Group has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.67%. Given that ADT has higher upside potential than The GEO Group, analysts believe ADT is more attractive than The GEO Group.

ADT has a beta of 1.510, which suggesting that the stock is 50.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The GEO Group has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.768%.

ADT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. The GEO Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ADT pays 27.77% of its earnings as a dividend. The GEO Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ADT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ADT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than The GEO Group quarterly revenues of $603.1M. ADT's net income of $127.2M is higher than The GEO Group's net income of $26.3M. Notably, ADT's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.57x while The GEO Group's PE ratio is 121.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADT is 1.34x versus 1.91x for The GEO Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSA Safety has a net margin of 10.22% compared to ADT's net margin of 15.4%. ADT's return on equity of 24.01% beat MSA Safety's return on equity of 27.57%.

ADT has a consensus price target of $9.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand MSA Safety has an analysts' consensus of $199.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.76%. Given that MSA Safety has higher upside potential than ADT, analysts believe MSA Safety is more attractive than ADT.

ADT has a beta of 1.510, which suggesting that the stock is 50.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSA Safety has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.364%.

ADT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. MSA Safety offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. ADT pays 27.77% of its earnings as a dividend. MSA Safety pays out 125.44% of its earnings as a dividend. ADT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MSA Safety's is not.

ADT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than MSA Safety quarterly revenues of $432.7M. ADT's net income of $127.2M is higher than MSA Safety's net income of $66.6M. Notably, ADT's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.57x while MSA Safety's PE ratio is 23.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADT is 1.34x versus 3.60x for MSA Safety. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wealthcraft Capital has a net margin of 10.22% compared to ADT's net margin of --. ADT's return on equity of 24.01% beat Wealthcraft Capital's return on equity of --.

ADT has a consensus price target of $9.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand Wealthcraft Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ADT has higher upside potential than Wealthcraft Capital, analysts believe ADT is more attractive than Wealthcraft Capital.

ADT has a beta of 1.510, which suggesting that the stock is 50.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wealthcraft Capital has a beta of -2.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 394.558%.

ADT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Wealthcraft Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ADT pays 27.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Wealthcraft Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ADT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ADT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Wealthcraft Capital quarterly revenues of --. ADT's net income of $127.2M is higher than Wealthcraft Capital's net income of --. Notably, ADT's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.57x while Wealthcraft Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADT is 1.34x versus 0.30x for Wealthcraft Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.