BLPG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ameriguard Security Services has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of -7.75%. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat Ameriguard Security Services's return on equity of --.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ameriguard Security Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Line Protection Group has higher upside potential than Ameriguard Security Services, analysts believe Blue Line Protection Group is more attractive than Ameriguard Security Services.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 2.995, which suggesting that the stock is 199.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ameriguard Security Services has a beta of -2.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 390.006%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ameriguard Security Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ameriguard Security Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than Ameriguard Security Services quarterly revenues of $7M. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $79.3K is higher than Ameriguard Security Services's net income of -$540.8K. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while Ameriguard Security Services's PE ratio is 757.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 1.00x for Ameriguard Security Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Compx International has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of 11.74%. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat Compx International's return on equity of 10.38%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Compx International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.12%. Given that Compx International has higher upside potential than Blue Line Protection Group, analysts believe Compx International is more attractive than Blue Line Protection Group.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 2.995, which suggesting that the stock is 199.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compx International has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.664%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compx International offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compx International pays out 237.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than Compx International quarterly revenues of $38.4M. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $79.3K is lower than Compx International's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while Compx International's PE ratio is 16.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 1.84x for Compx International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The GEO Group has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of 2.55%. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat The GEO Group's return on equity of 2.45%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The GEO Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.20 which suggests that it could grow by 72.99%. Given that The GEO Group has higher upside potential than Blue Line Protection Group, analysts believe The GEO Group is more attractive than Blue Line Protection Group.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 2.995, which suggesting that the stock is 199.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The GEO Group has a beta of 0.905, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.451%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The GEO Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The GEO Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than The GEO Group quarterly revenues of $607.7M. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $79.3K is lower than The GEO Group's net income of $15.5M. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while The GEO Group's PE ratio is 134.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 1.42x for The GEO Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wealthcraft Capital has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of --. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat Wealthcraft Capital's return on equity of --.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wealthcraft Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Line Protection Group has higher upside potential than Wealthcraft Capital, analysts believe Blue Line Protection Group is more attractive than Wealthcraft Capital.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 2.995, which suggesting that the stock is 199.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wealthcraft Capital has a beta of -3.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 406.361%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wealthcraft Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wealthcraft Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are larger than Wealthcraft Capital quarterly revenues of --. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $79.3K is higher than Wealthcraft Capital's net income of --. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while Wealthcraft Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 0.52x for Wealthcraft Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.