BLPG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ameriguard Security Services has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of -20.05%. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat Ameriguard Security Services's return on equity of --.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ameriguard Security Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Line Protection Group has higher upside potential than Ameriguard Security Services, analysts believe Blue Line Protection Group is more attractive than Ameriguard Security Services.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 3.322, which suggesting that the stock is 232.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ameriguard Security Services has a beta of -4.591, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 559.078%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ameriguard Security Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ameriguard Security Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than Ameriguard Security Services quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $3.8K is higher than Ameriguard Security Services's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while Ameriguard Security Services's PE ratio is 757.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 0.72x for Ameriguard Security Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Digital Solutions has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of --. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat Global Digital Solutions's return on equity of --.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Digital Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Line Protection Group has higher upside potential than Global Digital Solutions, analysts believe Blue Line Protection Group is more attractive than Global Digital Solutions.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 3.322, which suggesting that the stock is 232.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Digital Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Digital Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Digital Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are larger than Global Digital Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $3.8K is higher than Global Digital Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while Global Digital Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 0.33x for Global Digital Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The GEO Group has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of 3.24%. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat The GEO Group's return on equity of 2.19%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The GEO Group has an analysts' consensus of $41.80 which suggests that it could grow by 57.62%. Given that The GEO Group has higher upside potential than Blue Line Protection Group, analysts believe The GEO Group is more attractive than Blue Line Protection Group.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 3.322, which suggesting that the stock is 232.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The GEO Group has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.352%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The GEO Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The GEO Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than The GEO Group quarterly revenues of $604.6M. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $3.8K is lower than The GEO Group's net income of $19.6M. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while The GEO Group's PE ratio is 139.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 1.50x for The GEO Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wealthcraft Capital has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Blue Line Protection Group's net margin of --. Blue Line Protection Group's return on equity of -- beat Wealthcraft Capital's return on equity of --.

Blue Line Protection Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wealthcraft Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Line Protection Group has higher upside potential than Wealthcraft Capital, analysts believe Blue Line Protection Group is more attractive than Wealthcraft Capital.

Blue Line Protection Group has a beta of 3.322, which suggesting that the stock is 232.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wealthcraft Capital has a beta of -7.232, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 823.178%.

Blue Line Protection Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wealthcraft Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wealthcraft Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group quarterly revenues are $1M, which are larger than Wealthcraft Capital quarterly revenues of --. Blue Line Protection Group's net income of $3.8K is higher than Wealthcraft Capital's net income of --. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.71x while Wealthcraft Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group is 0.15x versus 1.34x for Wealthcraft Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.