Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Sell
43
SNPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.54
Seasonality move
:
5.8%
Day range:
$0.59 - $0.59
52-week range:
$0.45 - $0.70
Dividend yield:
8.22%
P/E ratio:
10.35x
P/S ratio:
0.17x
P/B ratio:
0.63x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
34.7K
1-year change:
19.18%
Market cap:
$71.6B
Revenue:
$444.9B
EPS (TTM):
$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
$107B | -- | 13.73% | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
$115.6B | -- | 14.12% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
$0.59 | -- | $71.6B | 10.35x | $0.02 | 8.22% | 0.17x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
$0.81 | -- | $148.7B | 6.62x | $0.03 | 7.78% | 0.36x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
$2.24 | -- | $62.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.09x |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
$0.51 | -- | $49.5M | 19.98x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.19x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 10.93x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
26.52% | -0.208 | -- | 0.35x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
13.12% | -0.101 | 18.45% | 0.57x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
6.06% | 2.965 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
33.38% | -3.070 | 180.49% | 0.94x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
74.04% | -0.050 | 320.04% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
$16.3B | $1.8B | 3.94% | 6.14% | 2.08% | $4.1B |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
$22.5B | $8.7B | 8.45% | 9.77% | 9.78% | -$40B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -4.38% | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
$194.5M | $84.6M | 2.65% | 9.65% | 3.41% | -$55.1M |
China Petroleum & Chemical vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or LSE?
has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical14.79% $0.01 $176.4B LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than , analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0 0 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or LSE More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.22%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.17x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0.17x 10.35x $110.4B $1.1B LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or PCCYF?
PetroChina has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of 6.25%. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical14.79% $0.01 $176.4B PCCYFPetroChina22.93% $0.03 $271.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than PetroChina.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or PCCYF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.825%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.22%. PetroChina offers a yield of 7.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $98.1B. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.1B. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while PetroChina's PE ratio is 6.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.17x versus 0.36x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0.17x 10.35x $110.4B $1.1B PCCYFPetroChina0.36x 6.62x $98.1B $6.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or RCON?
Recon Technology has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical14.79% $0.01 $176.4B RCONRecon Technology-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than Recon Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or RCON More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 2.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.021%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.22%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.17x versus 2.09x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0.17x 10.35x $110.4B $1.1B RCONRecon Technology2.09x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or SEGYY?
SPT Energy Group has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat SPT Energy Group's return on equity of -4.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical14.79% $0.01 $176.4B SEGYYSPT Energy Group-- -- $252.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or SEGYY?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPT Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than SPT Energy Group, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than SPT Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0 0 0 SEGYYSPT Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or SEGYY More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPT Energy Group has a beta of -0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or SEGYY?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.22%. SPT Energy Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPT Energy Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or SEGYY?
China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than SPT Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is higher than SPT Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while SPT Energy Group's PE ratio is 19.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.17x versus 0.19x for SPT Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0.17x 10.35x $110.4B $1.1B SEGYYSPT Energy Group0.19x 19.98x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of 1.24%. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical14.79% $0.01 $176.4B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service7.71% $0.00 $5B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or YZCFF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.22%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 10.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.17x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0.17x 10.35x $110.4B $1.1B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service-- 10.93x $2.5B $31.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will T-Mobile Stock Recover?
Last year was a stellar year for telecom giant T-Mobile…
Why Is Stanley Druckenmiller Buying Citigroup?
As recently as 2020, few analysts could have predicted that…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x
Sell
48
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
NUTX alert for Jan 17
Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 2.83% over the past day.
Buy
53
QMCO alert for Jan 17
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Sell
34
NGVT alert for Jan 17
Ingevity [NGVT] is up 1.31% over the past day.
