Financhill
Buy
68

PCCYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.88
Seasonality move :
-8.78%
Day range:
$0.83 - $0.88
52-week range:
$0.59 - $1.08
Dividend yield:
7.18%
P/E ratio:
7.00x
P/S ratio:
0.40x
P/B ratio:
0.75x
Volume:
12.7K
Avg. volume:
35K
1-year change:
-9.28%
Market cap:
$161.1B
Revenue:
$409.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.13

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PCCYF
PetroChina
$92.6B -- -7.37% -- --
LSE
-- -- -- -- --
RCON
Recon Technology
-- -- -- -- --
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
$3B -- -4.05% -- --
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PCCYF
PetroChina
$0.88 -- $161.1B 7.00x $0.03 7.18% 0.40x
LSE
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
RCON
Recon Technology
$2.60 -- $72.7M -- $0.00 0% 3.43x
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
$0.16 -- $1.7B 76.77x $0.00 0% 0.14x
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
$0.07 -- $1.2B 13.37x $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PCCYF
PetroChina
13.54% -0.216 19.46% 0.70x
LSE
-- 0.000 -- --
RCON
Recon Technology
6.06% 2.740 22.17% 9.49x
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
0.78% 1.677 1.88% 0.91x
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
72.19% -0.253 260.17% 0.58x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PCCYF
PetroChina
$21.8B $8.8B 8.53% 9.71% 9.48% -$40B
LSE
-- -- -- -- -- --
RCON
Recon Technology
-- -- -10.39% -11.14% -- --
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
$455.2M -$15.7M 0.52% 0.58% -0.59% $985.8M
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
$199M $84.1M 2.1% 7.65% 3.08% $156.1M

PetroChina vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or LSE?

    has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PetroChina's net margin of --. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71% beat 's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    21.09% $0.04 $276.6B
    LSE
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or LSE?

    PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than , analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than .

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0 0 0
    LSE
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCYF or LSE More Risky?

    PetroChina has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or LSE?

    PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or LSE?

    PetroChina quarterly revenues are $103.5B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina's net income of $6.4B is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.00x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.40x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0.40x 7.00x $103.5B $6.4B
    LSE
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or RCON?

    Recon Technology has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PetroChina's net margin of --. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    21.09% $0.04 $276.6B
    RCON
    Recon Technology
    -- -- $72M
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or RCON?

    PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than Recon Technology.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0 0 0
    RCON
    Recon Technology
    0 1 0
  • Is PCCYF or RCON More Risky?

    PetroChina has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 1.624, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.388%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or RCON?

    PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or RCON?

    PetroChina quarterly revenues are $103.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina's net income of $6.4B is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.00x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.40x versus 3.43x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0.40x 7.00x $103.5B $6.4B
    RCON
    Recon Technology
    3.43x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or SPTJF?

    Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PetroChina's net margin of -0.46%. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71% beat Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of 0.58%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    21.09% $0.04 $276.6B
    SPTJF
    Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
    16.97% -$0.00 $3.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or SPTJF?

    PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0 0 0
    SPTJF
    Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCYF or SPTJF More Risky?

    PetroChina has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.583, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.671%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or SPTJF?

    PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays out 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or SPTJF?

    PetroChina quarterly revenues are $103.5B, which are larger than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PetroChina's net income of $6.4B is higher than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of -$12.3M. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.00x while Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's PE ratio is 76.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.40x versus 0.14x for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0.40x 7.00x $103.5B $6.4B
    SPTJF
    Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
    0.14x 76.77x $2.7B -$12.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or YZCFF?

    Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PetroChina's net margin of 1.22%. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.65%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    21.09% $0.04 $276.6B
    YZCFF
    Sinopec Oilfield Service
    8.11% $0.00 $4.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or YZCFF?

    PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0 0 0
    YZCFF
    Sinopec Oilfield Service
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCYF or YZCFF More Risky?

    PetroChina has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.638%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or YZCFF?

    PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or YZCFF?

    PetroChina quarterly revenues are $103.5B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. PetroChina's net income of $6.4B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $30M. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.00x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.40x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCYF
    PetroChina
    0.40x 7.00x $103.5B $6.4B
    YZCFF
    Sinopec Oilfield Service
    -- 13.37x $2.5B $30M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?

Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…

Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?
Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?

Last week, Senators Bernie Sanders and Angus King introduced a…

Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?
Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?

By every traditional yardstick, including a price‑to‑sales well above 100,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 14

VEON [VEON] is down 18.57% over the past day.

Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 14

Dave [DAVE] is down 12.68% over the past day.

Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 14

Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 9.12% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock