PCCYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Recon Technology has a net margin of 6.25% compared to PetroChina's net margin of --. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than Recon Technology.

PetroChina has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 2.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.021%.

PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.78%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PetroChina quarterly revenues are $98.1B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina's net income of $6.1B is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.62x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.36x versus 2.09x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPT Energy Group has a net margin of 6.25% compared to PetroChina's net margin of --. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77% beat SPT Energy Group's return on equity of -4.38%.

PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPT Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than SPT Energy Group, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than SPT Energy Group.

PetroChina has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPT Energy Group has a beta of -0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.437%.

PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.78%. SPT Energy Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. SPT Energy Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PetroChina quarterly revenues are $98.1B, which are larger than SPT Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina's net income of $6.1B is higher than SPT Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.62x while SPT Energy Group's PE ratio is 19.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.36x versus 0.19x for SPT Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a net margin of 6.25% compared to PetroChina's net margin of 1.02%. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77% beat China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14%.

PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical.

PetroChina has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.573%.

PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.78%. China Petroleum & Chemical offers a yield of 8.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. PetroChina pays 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PetroChina quarterly revenues are $98.1B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues of $110.4B. PetroChina's net income of $6.1B is higher than China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.62x while China Petroleum & Chemical's PE ratio is 10.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.36x versus 0.17x for China Petroleum & Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 6.25% compared to PetroChina's net margin of 1.24%. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65%.

PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

PetroChina has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.77%.

PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.78%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

PetroChina quarterly revenues are $98.1B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. PetroChina's net income of $6.1B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.62x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 10.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.36x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.