SGTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PureBase has a net margin of -82.82% compared to Sustainable Green Team's net margin of -135.5%. Sustainable Green Team's return on equity of -15.4% beat PureBase's return on equity of --.

Sustainable Green Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PureBase has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sustainable Green Team has higher upside potential than PureBase, analysts believe Sustainable Green Team is more attractive than PureBase.

Sustainable Green Team has a beta of 3.663, which suggesting that the stock is 266.314% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PureBase has a beta of 0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.903%.

Sustainable Green Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PureBase offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sustainable Green Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PureBase pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sustainable Green Team quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than PureBase quarterly revenues of $204.3K. Sustainable Green Team's net income of -$896K is lower than PureBase's net income of -$276.8K. Notably, Sustainable Green Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PureBase's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sustainable Green Team is 1.64x versus -- for PureBase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of -82.82% compared to Sustainable Green Team's net margin of -30.05%. Sustainable Green Team's return on equity of -15.4% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -16.85%.

Sustainable Green Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $2.63 which suggests that it could grow by 59.09%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than Sustainable Green Team, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than Sustainable Green Team.

Sustainable Green Team has a beta of 3.663, which suggesting that the stock is 266.314% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.846%.

Sustainable Green Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sustainable Green Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -12.41% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sustainable Green Team quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Sustainable Green Team's net income of -$896K is lower than United States Antimony's net income of -$727.5K. Notably, Sustainable Green Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sustainable Green Team is 1.64x versus 17.47x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of -82.82% compared to Sustainable Green Team's net margin of 37.3%. Sustainable Green Team's return on equity of -15.4% beat United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52%.

Sustainable Green Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sustainable Green Team has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Sustainable Green Team is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

Sustainable Green Team has a beta of 3.663, which suggesting that the stock is 266.314% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.993%.

Sustainable Green Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Lime & Minerals offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sustainable Green Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sustainable Green Team quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues of $89.4M. Sustainable Green Team's net income of -$896K is lower than United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Sustainable Green Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Lime & Minerals's PE ratio is 35.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sustainable Green Team is 1.64x versus 11.41x for United States Lime & Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Resources has a net margin of -82.82% compared to Sustainable Green Team's net margin of -1404.47%. Sustainable Green Team's return on equity of -15.4% beat Verde Resources's return on equity of -6.09%.

Sustainable Green Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Verde Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sustainable Green Team has higher upside potential than Verde Resources, analysts believe Sustainable Green Team is more attractive than Verde Resources.

Sustainable Green Team has a beta of 3.663, which suggesting that the stock is 266.314% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Resources has a beta of -1.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 277.996%.

Sustainable Green Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verde Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sustainable Green Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sustainable Green Team quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Verde Resources quarterly revenues of $125.6K. Sustainable Green Team's net income of -$896K is lower than Verde Resources's net income of $354.7K. Notably, Sustainable Green Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verde Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sustainable Green Team is 1.64x versus 995.19x for Verde Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.