SCFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Angi has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings's net margin of -0.48%. Security First International Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Angi's return on equity of 3.42%.

Security First International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Angi has an analysts' consensus of $24.39 which suggests that it could grow by 117.76%. Given that Angi has higher upside potential than Security First International Holdings, analysts believe Angi is more attractive than Security First International Holdings.

Security First International Holdings has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Angi has a beta of 1.843, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.325%.

Security First International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Angi offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Angi pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Angi quarterly revenues of $267.9M. Security First International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Angi's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Security First International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Angi's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings is -- versus 0.48x for Angi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IZEA Worldwide has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings's net margin of -99.28%. Security First International Holdings's return on equity of -- beat IZEA Worldwide's return on equity of -25.72%.

Security First International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IZEA Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 362.96%. Given that IZEA Worldwide has higher upside potential than Security First International Holdings, analysts believe IZEA Worldwide is more attractive than Security First International Holdings.

Security First International Holdings has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IZEA Worldwide has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.351%.

Security First International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IZEA Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IZEA Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IZEA Worldwide quarterly revenues of $8.8M. Security First International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than IZEA Worldwide's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Security First International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IZEA Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings is -- versus 0.88x for IZEA Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lendway has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings's net margin of -16.97%. Security First International Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.

Security First International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Security First International Holdings has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Security First International Holdings is more attractive than Lendway.

Security First International Holdings has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.225%.

Security First International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Security First International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Security First International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings is -- versus 0.18x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings's net margin of 15.52%. Security First International Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 3.42%.

Security First International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $51.71 which suggests that it could grow by 63.03%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than Security First International Holdings, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than Security First International Holdings.

Security First International Holdings has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.466%.

Security First International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $412.8M. Security First International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of $64.1M. Notably, Security First International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 24.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings is -- versus 1.04x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.