IZEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Angi has a net margin of -1.79% compared to IZEA Worldwide's net margin of 6.14%. IZEA Worldwide's return on equity of -28.74% beat Angi's return on equity of 5.01%.

IZEA Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 258.42%. On the other hand Angi has an analysts' consensus of $21.35 which suggests that it could grow by 38.28%. Given that IZEA Worldwide has higher upside potential than Angi, analysts believe IZEA Worldwide is more attractive than Angi.

IZEA Worldwide has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.15% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Angi has a beta of 1.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.74%.

IZEA Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Angi offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IZEA Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Angi pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IZEA Worldwide quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Angi quarterly revenues of $245.9M. IZEA Worldwide's net income of -$142.8K is lower than Angi's net income of $15.1M. Notably, IZEA Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Angi's PE ratio is 14.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IZEA Worldwide is 1.28x versus 0.69x for Angi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lendway has a net margin of -1.79% compared to IZEA Worldwide's net margin of 3.61%. IZEA Worldwide's return on equity of -28.74% beat Lendway's return on equity of -29.67%.

IZEA Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 258.42%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IZEA Worldwide has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe IZEA Worldwide is more attractive than Lendway.

IZEA Worldwide has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.15% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.946%.

IZEA Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IZEA Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IZEA Worldwide quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Lendway quarterly revenues of $12.4M. IZEA Worldwide's net income of -$142.8K is lower than Lendway's net income of $449K. Notably, IZEA Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IZEA Worldwide is 1.28x versus 0.20x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Security First International Holdings has a net margin of -1.79% compared to IZEA Worldwide's net margin of --. IZEA Worldwide's return on equity of -28.74% beat Security First International Holdings's return on equity of --.

IZEA Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 258.42%. On the other hand Security First International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IZEA Worldwide has higher upside potential than Security First International Holdings, analysts believe IZEA Worldwide is more attractive than Security First International Holdings.

IZEA Worldwide has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.15% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Security First International Holdings has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.562%.

IZEA Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Security First International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IZEA Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Security First International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IZEA Worldwide quarterly revenues are $8M, which are larger than Security First International Holdings quarterly revenues of --. IZEA Worldwide's net income of -$142.8K is higher than Security First International Holdings's net income of --. Notably, IZEA Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Security First International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IZEA Worldwide is 1.28x versus -- for Security First International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -1.79% compared to IZEA Worldwide's net margin of 7.38%. IZEA Worldwide's return on equity of -28.74% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 4.19%.

IZEA Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 258.42%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $41.33 which suggests that it could grow by 34.29%. Given that IZEA Worldwide has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, analysts believe IZEA Worldwide is more attractive than Ziff Davis.

IZEA Worldwide has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.15% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.531%.

IZEA Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IZEA Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IZEA Worldwide quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $328.6M. IZEA Worldwide's net income of -$142.8K is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of $24.2M. Notably, IZEA Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 18.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IZEA Worldwide is 1.28x versus 0.99x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.