PHIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BitMine Immersion Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to PHI Group's net margin of -76.24%. PHI Group's return on equity of -- beat BitMine Immersion Technologies's return on equity of -88.47%.

PHI Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BitMine Immersion Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PHI Group has higher upside potential than BitMine Immersion Technologies, analysts believe PHI Group is more attractive than BitMine Immersion Technologies.

PHI Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitMine Immersion Technologies has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.17%.

PHI Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BitMine Immersion Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PHI Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PHI Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BitMine Immersion Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.5M. PHI Group's net income of -$480.7K is higher than BitMine Immersion Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, PHI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BitMine Immersion Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHI Group is -- versus 4.04x for BitMine Immersion Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to PHI Group's net margin of 7.22%. PHI Group's return on equity of -- beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16%.

PHI Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $236.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.93%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than PHI Group, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than PHI Group.

PHI Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.556%.

PHI Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. PHI Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PHI Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $208.6M. PHI Group's net income of -$480.7K is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M. Notably, PHI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 38.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHI Group is -- versus 10.30x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -- compared to PHI Group's net margin of -183.64%. PHI Group's return on equity of -- beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

PHI Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.67 which suggests that it could grow by 62.18%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than PHI Group, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than PHI Group.

PHI Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 352.9%.

PHI Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PHI Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PHI Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. PHI Group's net income of -$480.7K is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, PHI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHI Group is -- versus 6.45x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of -- compared to PHI Group's net margin of 29.96%. PHI Group's return on equity of -- beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91%.

PHI Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PHI Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe PHI Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

PHI Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.243%.

PHI Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PHI Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PHI Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $28.9M. PHI Group's net income of -$480.7K is lower than Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M. Notably, PHI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 9.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHI Group is -- versus 2.01x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.