NHNCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Interactive Technologies has a net margin of 15.25% compared to NAVER's net margin of -4322307.69%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.05% beat Global Interactive Technologies's return on equity of -42.45%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Interactive Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NAVER has higher upside potential than Global Interactive Technologies, analysts believe NAVER is more attractive than Global Interactive Technologies.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Interactive Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Global Interactive Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Interactive Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Global Interactive Technologies quarterly revenues of $10. NAVER's net income of $292.2M is higher than Global Interactive Technologies's net income of -$566.7K. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while Global Interactive Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.24x versus 6.69x for Global Interactive Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GRAVITY has a net margin of 15.25% compared to NAVER's net margin of 16.03%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.05% beat GRAVITY's return on equity of 14.88%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GRAVITY has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NAVER has higher upside potential than GRAVITY, analysts believe NAVER is more attractive than GRAVITY.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GRAVITY has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.022%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. GRAVITY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. GRAVITY pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than GRAVITY quarterly revenues of $94.5M. NAVER's net income of $292.2M is higher than GRAVITY's net income of $15.2M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while GRAVITY's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.24x versus 1.17x for GRAVITY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KT has a net margin of 15.25% compared to NAVER's net margin of 8.28%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.05% beat KT's return on equity of 3.48%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KT has an analysts' consensus of $21.49 which suggests that it could grow by 7.5%. Given that KT has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe KT is more attractive than NAVER.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KT has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.753%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. KT offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. KT pays out 189.7% of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but KT's is not.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than KT quarterly revenues of $4.7B. NAVER's net income of $292.2M is lower than KT's net income of $389.8M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while KT's PE ratio is 19.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.24x versus 0.52x for KT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SK Telecom has a net margin of 15.25% compared to NAVER's net margin of 8.18%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.05% beat SK Telecom's return on equity of 10.25%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SK Telecom has an analysts' consensus of $26.69 which suggests that it could grow by 21.65%. Given that SK Telecom has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe SK Telecom is more attractive than NAVER.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SK Telecom has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.709%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. SK Telecom offers a yield of 6.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SK Telecom pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than SK Telecom quarterly revenues of $3.1B. NAVER's net income of $292.2M is higher than SK Telecom's net income of $250.6M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while SK Telecom's PE ratio is 9.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.24x versus 0.66x for SK Telecom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.