KT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Interactive Technologies has a net margin of 8.28% compared to KT's net margin of -4322307.69%. KT's return on equity of 3.48% beat Global Interactive Technologies's return on equity of -42.45%.

KT has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.24%. On the other hand Global Interactive Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KT has higher upside potential than Global Interactive Technologies, analysts believe KT is more attractive than Global Interactive Technologies.

KT has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Interactive Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

KT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Global Interactive Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KT pays 189.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Interactive Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KT quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Global Interactive Technologies quarterly revenues of $10. KT's net income of $389.8M is higher than Global Interactive Technologies's net income of -$566.7K. Notably, KT's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while Global Interactive Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KT is 0.24x versus 6.69x for Global Interactive Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GRAVITY has a net margin of 8.28% compared to KT's net margin of 16.03%. KT's return on equity of 3.48% beat GRAVITY's return on equity of 14.88%.

KT has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.24%. On the other hand GRAVITY has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KT has higher upside potential than GRAVITY, analysts believe KT is more attractive than GRAVITY.

KT has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GRAVITY has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.022%.

KT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. GRAVITY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KT pays 189.7% of its earnings as a dividend. GRAVITY pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KT quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than GRAVITY quarterly revenues of $94.5M. KT's net income of $389.8M is higher than GRAVITY's net income of $15.2M. Notably, KT's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while GRAVITY's PE ratio is 7.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KT is 0.24x versus 1.21x for GRAVITY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAVER has a net margin of 8.28% compared to KT's net margin of 15.25%. KT's return on equity of 3.48% beat NAVER's return on equity of 7.05%.

KT has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.24%. On the other hand NAVER has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KT has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe KT is more attractive than NAVER.

KT has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAVER has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

KT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. NAVER offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. KT pays 189.7% of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER pays out 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but KT's is not.

KT quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than NAVER quarterly revenues of $1.9B. KT's net income of $389.8M is higher than NAVER's net income of $292.2M. Notably, KT's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while NAVER's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KT is 0.24x versus 2.24x for NAVER. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SK Telecom has a net margin of 8.28% compared to KT's net margin of 7.59%. KT's return on equity of 3.48% beat SK Telecom's return on equity of 10.51%.

KT has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.24%. On the other hand SK Telecom has an analysts' consensus of $26.69 which suggests that it could grow by 29.94%. Given that SK Telecom has higher upside potential than KT, analysts believe SK Telecom is more attractive than KT.

KT has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SK Telecom has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.709%.

KT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. SK Telecom offers a yield of 6.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. KT pays 189.7% of its earnings as a dividend. SK Telecom pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. SK Telecom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but KT's is not.

KT quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than SK Telecom quarterly revenues of $3.2B. KT's net income of $389.8M is higher than SK Telecom's net income of $244.6M. Notably, KT's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while SK Telecom's PE ratio is 8.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KT is 0.24x versus 0.60x for SK Telecom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.