NABZY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Computershare has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 10.89% beat Computershare's return on equity of 26.84%.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling downside risk potential of -9.9%. On the other hand Computershare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Computershare.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.73%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. Computershare offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare pays out 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Computershare quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Computershare's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while Computershare's PE ratio is 28.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 6.00x versus 5.08x for Computershare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of 16.73%. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 10.89% beat IREN's return on equity of -3.18%.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling downside risk potential of -9.9%. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $18.52 which suggests that it could grow by 103.1%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than National Australia Bank, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than National Australia Bank.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $144.8M. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $24.2M. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 6.00x versus 5.02x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macquarie Group has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 10.89% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68%.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling downside risk potential of -9.9%. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Macquarie Group.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.098%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 21.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 6.00x versus 11.50x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 10.89% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.

National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling downside risk potential of -9.9%. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.

National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.853%.

National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 6.00x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.