MSCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of -5.94%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC has an analysts' consensus of $13.28 which suggests that it could grow by 20.73%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Chicago Atlantic BDC offers a yield of 9.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are larger than Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues of $2.8M. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is higher than Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Chicago Atlantic BDC's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus 5.84x for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 23.24%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 16.33%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $115.97 which suggests that it could grow by 4.31%. Given that Northern Trust has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe Northern Trust is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.949%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $2B. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $455.4M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 11.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus 2.70x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of -22.23%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat LendingTree's return on equity of -30.49%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $69.29 which suggests that it could grow by 67.16%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 2.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.574%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $260.8M. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is higher than LendingTree's net income of -$58M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus 0.71x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

180 Degree Capital has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of --. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 180 Degree Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.843%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. 180 Degree Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. 180 Degree Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are larger than 180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues of --. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is higher than 180 Degree Capital's net income of --. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while 180 Degree Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus -- for 180 Degree Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.