TURN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -2.73%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.61 which suggests that it could grow by 6.69%. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays out -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues of $579.8M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 1.63x for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Financial Gravity Companies has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of --. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Financial Gravity Companies's return on equity of --.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Financial Gravity Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 180 Degree Capital has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Companies, analysts believe 180 Degree Capital is more attractive than Financial Gravity Companies.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Financial Gravity Companies has a beta of -0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 199.749%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Financial Gravity Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Financial Gravity Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Financial Gravity Companies quarterly revenues of --. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Financial Gravity Companies's net income of --. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Financial Gravity Companies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 2.48x for Financial Gravity Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -6.04%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of -5.55%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Portman Ridge Finance has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.36%. Given that Portman Ridge Finance has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Portman Ridge Finance is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.63%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Portman Ridge Finance offers a yield of 19.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -425.58% of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Portman Ridge Finance quarterly revenues of $1.4M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Portman Ridge Finance's net income of -$82K. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Portman Ridge Finance's PE ratio is 42.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 31.08x for Portman Ridge Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -5.16%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat LendingTree's return on equity of -47.16%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.9%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 1.760, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.022%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $239.7M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than LendingTree's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 0.48x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.