MSADY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of -15.37% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net margin of 29.97%. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's return on equity of 10.16% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.47%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.53 which suggests that it could fall by -1.91%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.987%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings pays 31.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings quarterly revenues are -$7.1B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.3B. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net income of $1.1B is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings is 1.35x versus 3.00x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of -15.37% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net margin of 29.16%. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's return on equity of 10.16% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 9.14%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $13.01 which suggests that it could grow by 2.16%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.254%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings pays 31.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings quarterly revenues are -$7.1B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $11B. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net income of $1.1B is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $3.2B. Notably, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings is 1.35x versus 3.33x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of -15.37% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net margin of 22.13%. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's return on equity of 10.16% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.28%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.18 which suggests that it could grow by 11.46%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.383%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings pays 31.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings quarterly revenues are -$7.1B, which are smaller than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $3B. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net income of $1.1B is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $665.1M. Notably, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 9.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings is 1.35x versus 1.80x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of -15.37% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net margin of 31.35%. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's return on equity of 10.16% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $16.86 which suggests that it could grow by 10.13%. Given that Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has higher upside potential than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, analysts believe Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group is more attractive than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.83%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings pays 31.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings quarterly revenues are -$7.1B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net income of $1.1B is lower than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings is 1.35x versus 3.28x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.