NMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 22.13% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 29.16%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.28% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 9.14%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.43, signalling upside risk potential of 38.02%. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $13.01 which suggests that it could grow by 12.41%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.333%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $11B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $665.1M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.51x versus 3.03x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

B. Riley Financial has a net margin of 22.13% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of -14.33%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.28% beat B. Riley Financial's return on equity of -37.71%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.43, signalling upside risk potential of 38.02%. On the other hand B. Riley Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 880.39%. Given that B. Riley Financial has higher upside potential than Nomura Holdings, analysts believe B. Riley Financial is more attractive than Nomura Holdings.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.699%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. B. Riley Financial offers a yield of 98.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial pays out -149.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than B. Riley Financial quarterly revenues of $343M. Nomura Holdings's net income of $665.1M is higher than B. Riley Financial's net income of -$49.2M. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while B. Riley Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.51x versus 0.06x for B. Riley Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 22.13% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 31.35%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.28% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.43, signalling upside risk potential of 38.02%. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $16.86 which suggests that it could grow by 28.61%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.658, which suggesting that the stock is 34.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.284%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $665.1M is lower than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 9.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.51x versus 2.53x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.