NMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 17.65% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 3.08%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.4%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.16, signalling upside risk potential of 17.55%. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.86 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mizuho Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mizuho Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.756%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M is higher than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $197.1M. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.66x versus 2.81x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 17.65% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 7.08%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.7%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.16, signalling upside risk potential of 17.55%. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $13.74 which suggests that it could fall by -2.7%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.621%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 28.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $10.6B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $747.7M. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.66x versus 3.67x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 17.65% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 3.36%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.85%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.16, signalling upside risk potential of 17.55%. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $16.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.121%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 34.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M is higher than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $275.6M. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.66x versus 3.01x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.