NMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 29.31%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.01%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 3.76%. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.28%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mizuho Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mizuho Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.469%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.77x versus 2.84x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 24.69%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 11.05%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 3.76%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $133.94 which suggests that it could fall by -2.85%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.92%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $15B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 17.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.77x versus 3.85x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 38.98%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.71%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 3.76%. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.31%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Nomura Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Nomura Holdings.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.074%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $12.1B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.77x versus 3.26x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 31.35%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling upside risk potential of 3.76%. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.08%. Given that Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has higher upside potential than Nomura Holdings, analysts believe Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group is more attractive than Nomura Holdings.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.617%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is lower than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.77x versus 3.15x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.