HTHIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of -1471.96%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.34% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $31.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.31%. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 45.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4451.471%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 30.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.42x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.98x versus 0.81x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 5.8%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.34% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $31.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.31%. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.46%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.027%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Hitachi pays 30.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.42x while Kubota's PE ratio is 7.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.98x versus 0.64x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of -3.6%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.34% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $31.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.31%. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.97 which suggests that it could grow by 1.89%. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than Kyocera.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.401%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hitachi pays 30.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.42x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 100.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.98x versus 1.24x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of --. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.34% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $31.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.31%. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 30.71% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.42x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.98x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.