GELYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a net margin of 7.82% compared to Geely Automobile Holdings's net margin of -3.68%. Geely Automobile Holdings's return on equity of 18.3% beat Guangzhou Automobile Group's return on equity of -0.92%.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guangzhou Automobile Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Geely Automobile Holdings has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group, analysts believe Geely Automobile Holdings is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guangzhou Automobile Group has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.681%.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Guangzhou Automobile Group offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geely Automobile Holdings pays 12.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group pays out 287.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Geely Automobile Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Guangzhou Automobile Group's is not.

Geely Automobile Holdings quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than Guangzhou Automobile Group quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Geely Automobile Holdings's net income of $779.7M is higher than Guangzhou Automobile Group's net income of -$100.6M. Notably, Geely Automobile Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while Guangzhou Automobile Group's PE ratio is 32.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geely Automobile Holdings is 0.75x versus 0.30x for Guangzhou Automobile Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NFT has a net margin of 7.82% compared to Geely Automobile Holdings's net margin of --. Geely Automobile Holdings's return on equity of 18.3% beat NFT's return on equity of --.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Geely Automobile Holdings has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Geely Automobile Holdings is more attractive than NFT.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.668, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 266.775%.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geely Automobile Holdings pays 12.75% of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geely Automobile Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geely Automobile Holdings quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Geely Automobile Holdings's net income of $779.7M is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Geely Automobile Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while NFT's PE ratio is 0.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geely Automobile Holdings is 0.75x versus 12.19x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of 7.82% compared to Geely Automobile Holdings's net margin of 2.64%. Geely Automobile Holdings's return on equity of 18.3% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $7.39 which suggests that it could grow by 17.05%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than Geely Automobile Holdings, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than Geely Automobile Holdings.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.197%.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geely Automobile Holdings pays 12.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geely Automobile Holdings quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Geely Automobile Holdings's net income of $779.7M is higher than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $32.5M. Notably, Geely Automobile Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 44.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geely Automobile Holdings is 0.75x versus 0.57x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of 7.82% compared to Geely Automobile Holdings's net margin of --. Geely Automobile Holdings's return on equity of 18.3% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Geely Automobile Holdings has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Geely Automobile Holdings is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Geely Automobile Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geely Automobile Holdings pays 12.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geely Automobile Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geely Automobile Holdings quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Geely Automobile Holdings's net income of $779.7M is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Geely Automobile Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.99x while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geely Automobile Holdings is 0.75x versus 124.68x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.