EJPRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of 6.75%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.81%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than East Japan Railway, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than East Japan Railway.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 68.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.749%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.37x while Kubota's PE ratio is 9.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.21x versus 0.75x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of -3.6%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.40 which suggests that it could fall by -2.45%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than East Japan Railway, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than East Japan Railway.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 68.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.241, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.921%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.37x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 51.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.21x versus 1.21x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of 5.34%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 203.03%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than East Japan Railway, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than East Japan Railway.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 68.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.37x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 7.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.21x versus 1.52x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of 9.53%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.56%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that East Japan Railway has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe East Japan Railway is more attractive than SECOM.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 68.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.351, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.883%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 39.71% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.37x while SECOM's PE ratio is 21.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.21x versus 2.79x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.