EHVVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Destiny Media Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -29.65%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Destiny Media Technologies's return on equity of -6.1%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Destiny Media Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ehave has higher upside potential than Destiny Media Technologies, analysts believe Ehave is more attractive than Destiny Media Technologies.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destiny Media Technologies has a beta of 0.791, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.908%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Destiny Media Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Destiny Media Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Destiny Media Technologies quarterly revenues of $1M. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Destiny Media Technologies's net income of -$302.1K. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Destiny Media Technologies's PE ratio is 88.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 1.18x for Destiny Media Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -4.72%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 267.37%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 0.61x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -6680.99%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 216.26%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $166.1K. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 24.22x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Versus Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -482.45%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Versus Systems's return on equity of -140.93%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Versus Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.49%. Given that Versus Systems has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Versus Systems is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Versus Systems has a beta of 2.616, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.576%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Versus Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Versus Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Versus Systems quarterly revenues of $199.4K. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Versus Systems's net income of -$961.8K. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Versus Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 59.17x for Versus Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.