DQJCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 3.89%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's return on equity of 1.68%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings has a beta of -0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.429%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings pays out 479.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Pan Pacific International Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's is not.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is higher than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's net income of $69.4M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.04x while Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings's PE ratio is 51.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.15x versus 0.46x for Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirin Holdings has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 3.65%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Kirin Holdings's return on equity of 7.26%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kirin Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.60 which suggests that it could grow by 28.68%. Given that Kirin Holdings has higher upside potential than Pan Pacific International Holdings, analysts believe Kirin Holdings is more attractive than Pan Pacific International Holdings.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirin Holdings has a beta of 0.207, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.341%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Kirin Holdings offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirin Holdings pays out 51.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Kirin Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is lower than Kirin Holdings's net income of $148.4M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.04x while Kirin Holdings's PE ratio is 14.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.15x versus 0.69x for Kirin Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sapporo Holdings has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 3.93%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Sapporo Holdings's return on equity of 8.81%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sapporo Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Sapporo Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Sapporo Holdings.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sapporo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Sapporo Holdings offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Sapporo Holdings pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Sapporo Holdings quarterly revenues of $928.6M. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is higher than Sapporo Holdings's net income of $36.5M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.04x while Sapporo Holdings's PE ratio is 28.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.15x versus 0.94x for Sapporo Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Takara Holdings has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 6.09%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Takara Holdings's return on equity of 6.02%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Takara Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Takara Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Takara Holdings.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Takara Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Takara Holdings offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Takara Holdings pays out 46.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Takara Holdings quarterly revenues of $545M. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is higher than Takara Holdings's net income of $33.2M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.04x while Takara Holdings's PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.15x versus 0.61x for Takara Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.