DBMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of 15.61%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.71 which suggests that it could grow by 3.8%. Given that Fastenal has higher upside potential than DBM Global, analysts believe Fastenal is more attractive than DBM Global.

DBM Global has a beta of -0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 116.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.268%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fastenal's PE ratio is 36.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 5.60x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of 4.63%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than DBM Global, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than DBM Global.

DBM Global has a beta of -0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 116.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.617%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 1.04x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of 8.14%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DBM Global has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe DBM Global is more attractive than IES Holdings.

DBM Global has a beta of -0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 116.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 22.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 1.56x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to DBM Global's net margin of -31.58%. DBM Global's return on equity of -- beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97%.

DBM Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.74%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than DBM Global, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than DBM Global.

DBM Global has a beta of -0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 116.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DBM Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DBM Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend.

DBM Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $173.3M. DBM Global's net income of -- is lower than Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, DBM Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DBM Global is -- versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.