CDCTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lead Real Estate has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of --. Goldcrest's return on equity of 3.71% beat Lead Real Estate's return on equity of 16.92%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lead Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Lead Real Estate, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Lead Real Estate.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.099, which suggesting that the stock is 109.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lead Real Estate has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.29%. Lead Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Goldcrest pays 53.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Lead Real Estate pays out 3.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $69.1M, which are larger than Lead Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. Goldcrest's net income of $14.6M is higher than Lead Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Lead Real Estate's PE ratio is 6.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 0.13x for Lead Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Real Estate Holdings has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of 10.44%. Goldcrest's return on equity of 3.71% beat Nomura Real Estate Holdings's return on equity of 10.12%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Real Estate Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Nomura Real Estate Holdings, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Nomura Real Estate Holdings.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.099, which suggesting that the stock is 109.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Real Estate Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.29%. Nomura Real Estate Holdings offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Goldcrest pays 53.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Real Estate Holdings pays out 36.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $69.1M, which are smaller than Nomura Real Estate Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Goldcrest's net income of $14.6M is lower than Nomura Real Estate Holdings's net income of $130.4M. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Nomura Real Estate Holdings's PE ratio is 9.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 0.97x for Nomura Real Estate Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Realty & Development has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of 15.31%. Goldcrest's return on equity of 3.71% beat Sumitomo Realty & Development's return on equity of 8.89%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Realty & Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Realty & Development, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Sumitomo Realty & Development.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.099, which suggesting that the stock is 109.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Realty & Development has a beta of 0.016, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.376%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.29%. Sumitomo Realty & Development offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Goldcrest pays 53.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Realty & Development pays out 16.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $69.1M, which are smaller than Sumitomo Realty & Development quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Goldcrest's net income of $14.6M is lower than Sumitomo Realty & Development's net income of $244.1M. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Sumitomo Realty & Development's PE ratio is 12.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 2.46x for Sumitomo Realty & Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Tatemono has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of 11.33%. Goldcrest's return on equity of 3.71% beat Tokyo Tatemono's return on equity of 11.82%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Tatemono has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Tokyo Tatemono, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Tokyo Tatemono.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.099, which suggesting that the stock is 109.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Tatemono has a beta of 0.167, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.299%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.29%. Tokyo Tatemono offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Goldcrest pays 53.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Tatemono pays out 23.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $69.1M, which are smaller than Tokyo Tatemono quarterly revenues of $830.7M. Goldcrest's net income of $14.6M is lower than Tokyo Tatemono's net income of $94.1M. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Tokyo Tatemono's PE ratio is 8.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 0.96x for Tokyo Tatemono. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.