BTZI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -- compared to BOTS's net margin of -11.03%. BOTS's return on equity of -- beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

BOTS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.14%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than BOTS, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than BOTS.

BOTS has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.047% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

BOTS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOTS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

BOTS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. BOTS's net income of -- is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, BOTS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOTS is -- versus 2.00x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evertec has a net margin of -- compared to BOTS's net margin of 11.65%. BOTS's return on equity of -- beat Evertec's return on equity of 15.03%.

BOTS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evertec has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.99%. Given that Evertec has higher upside potential than BOTS, analysts believe Evertec is more attractive than BOTS.

BOTS has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.047% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evertec has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.9%.

BOTS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Evertec offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. BOTS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evertec pays out 16.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Evertec's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOTS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evertec quarterly revenues of $211.8M. BOTS's net income of -- is lower than Evertec's net income of $24.7M. Notably, BOTS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evertec's PE ratio is 27.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOTS is -- versus 2.76x for Evertec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -- compared to BOTS's net margin of -9.14%. BOTS's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

BOTS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.87%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than BOTS, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than BOTS.

BOTS has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.047% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

BOTS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOTS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BOTS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. BOTS's net income of -- is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, BOTS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOTS is -- versus 1.27x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -- compared to BOTS's net margin of -1.23%. BOTS's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

BOTS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 38%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than BOTS, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than BOTS.

BOTS has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.047% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.556%.

BOTS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOTS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BOTS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. BOTS's net income of -- is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, BOTS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOTS is -- versus 0.32x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.