BABAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NFT has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat NFT's return on equity of --.

Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than NFT.

Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.245, which suggesting that the stock is 75.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 262.668%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.12x while NFT's PE ratio is 0.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.24x versus 13.33x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of -1.7%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $6.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.52%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.

Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.245, which suggesting that the stock is 75.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.6%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of -$20.3M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.12x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 56.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.24x versus 0.53x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.

Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.245, which suggesting that the stock is 75.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.12x while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.24x versus 11.75x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.