AXAHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eurazeo SE has a net margin of -- compared to AXA SA's net margin of --. AXA SA's return on equity of 14.47% beat Eurazeo SE's return on equity of -0.93%.

AXA SA has a consensus price target of $44.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.1%. On the other hand Eurazeo SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AXA SA has higher upside potential than Eurazeo SE, analysts believe AXA SA is more attractive than Eurazeo SE.

AXA SA has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eurazeo SE has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.469%.

AXA SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Eurazeo SE offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.61 per share. AXA SA pays 54.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Eurazeo SE pays out 9.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AXA SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eurazeo SE quarterly revenues of --. AXA SA's net income of -- is lower than Eurazeo SE's net income of --. Notably, AXA SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.23x while Eurazeo SE's PE ratio is 2.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXA SA is 0.83x versus 11.11x for Eurazeo SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peugeot Invest has a net margin of -- compared to AXA SA's net margin of --. AXA SA's return on equity of 14.47% beat Peugeot Invest's return on equity of 1.69%.

AXA SA has a consensus price target of $44.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.1%. On the other hand Peugeot Invest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AXA SA has higher upside potential than Peugeot Invest, analysts believe AXA SA is more attractive than Peugeot Invest.

AXA SA has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peugeot Invest has a beta of 0.186, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.376%.

AXA SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Peugeot Invest offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.53 per share. AXA SA pays 54.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Peugeot Invest pays out 51.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AXA SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Peugeot Invest quarterly revenues of --. AXA SA's net income of -- is lower than Peugeot Invest's net income of --. Notably, AXA SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.23x while Peugeot Invest's PE ratio is 17.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXA SA is 0.83x versus 7.50x for Peugeot Invest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tikehau Capital SCA has a net margin of -- compared to AXA SA's net margin of --. AXA SA's return on equity of 14.47% beat Tikehau Capital SCA's return on equity of 5.12%.

AXA SA has a consensus price target of $44.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.1%. On the other hand Tikehau Capital SCA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AXA SA has higher upside potential than Tikehau Capital SCA, analysts believe AXA SA is more attractive than Tikehau Capital SCA.

AXA SA has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tikehau Capital SCA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AXA SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Tikehau Capital SCA offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. AXA SA pays 54.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Tikehau Capital SCA pays out 69.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AXA SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tikehau Capital SCA quarterly revenues of --. AXA SA's net income of -- is lower than Tikehau Capital SCA's net income of --. Notably, AXA SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.23x while Tikehau Capital SCA's PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXA SA is 0.83x versus 7.09x for Tikehau Capital SCA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wendel SE has a net margin of -- compared to AXA SA's net margin of --. AXA SA's return on equity of 14.47% beat Wendel SE's return on equity of 9.95%.

AXA SA has a consensus price target of $44.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.1%. On the other hand Wendel SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AXA SA has higher upside potential than Wendel SE, analysts believe AXA SA is more attractive than Wendel SE.

AXA SA has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wendel SE has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.825%.

AXA SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Wendel SE offers a yield of 8.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.34 per share. AXA SA pays 54.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Wendel SE pays out 97.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AXA SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wendel SE quarterly revenues of --. AXA SA's net income of -- is lower than Wendel SE's net income of --. Notably, AXA SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.23x while Wendel SE's PE ratio is 8.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AXA SA is 0.83x versus 0.51x for Wendel SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.