ADDYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LuxExperience BV has a net margin of 6.96% compared to adidas AG's net margin of -2.27%. adidas AG's return on equity of 18.19% beat LuxExperience BV's return on equity of -8.84%.

adidas AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LuxExperience BV has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.94%. Given that LuxExperience BV has higher upside potential than adidas AG, analysts believe LuxExperience BV is more attractive than adidas AG.

adidas AG has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LuxExperience BV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

adidas AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. LuxExperience BV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. adidas AG pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. LuxExperience BV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. adidas AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

adidas AG quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than LuxExperience BV quarterly revenues of $255.2M. adidas AG's net income of $450.4M is higher than LuxExperience BV's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, adidas AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while LuxExperience BV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for adidas AG is 1.70x versus 0.85x for LuxExperience BV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 6.96% compared to adidas AG's net margin of 7.05%. adidas AG's return on equity of 18.19% beat Nike's return on equity of 31.91%.

adidas AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $73.36 which suggests that it could grow by 21.08%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than adidas AG, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than adidas AG.

adidas AG has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.917%.

adidas AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Nike offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. adidas AG pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

adidas AG quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.3B. adidas AG's net income of $450.4M is lower than Nike's net income of $794M. Notably, adidas AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while Nike's PE ratio is 20.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for adidas AG is 1.70x versus 1.90x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Porsche Automobil Holding SE has a net margin of 6.96% compared to adidas AG's net margin of 99.71%. adidas AG's return on equity of 18.19% beat Porsche Automobil Holding SE's return on equity of -45.31%.

adidas AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Porsche Automobil Holding SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that adidas AG has higher upside potential than Porsche Automobil Holding SE, analysts believe adidas AG is more attractive than Porsche Automobil Holding SE.

adidas AG has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Porsche Automobil Holding SE has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.232%.

adidas AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Porsche Automobil Holding SE offers a yield of 12.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. adidas AG pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Porsche Automobil Holding SE pays out -3.91% of its earnings as a dividend. adidas AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

adidas AG quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Porsche Automobil Holding SE quarterly revenues of -$1.1B. adidas AG's net income of $450.4M is higher than Porsche Automobil Holding SE's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, adidas AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while Porsche Automobil Holding SE's PE ratio is 8.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for adidas AG is 1.70x versus 2.58x for Porsche Automobil Holding SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 6.96% compared to adidas AG's net margin of -5.71%. adidas AG's return on equity of 18.19% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24%.

adidas AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $7.45 which suggests that it could grow by 10.95%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than adidas AG, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than adidas AG.

adidas AG has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.967% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.812%.

adidas AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. adidas AG pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. adidas AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

adidas AG quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.2B. adidas AG's net income of $450.4M is higher than Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M. Notably, adidas AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for adidas AG is 1.70x versus 0.56x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.