AATC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 39.63% compared to Autoscope Technologies's net margin of -0.35%. Autoscope Technologies's return on equity of 26.64% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49%.

Autoscope Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.49%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Autoscope Technologies, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Autoscope Technologies.

Autoscope Technologies has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.882%.

Autoscope Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoscope Technologies pays 42.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoscope Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoscope Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.6M. Autoscope Technologies's net income of $1.3M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K. Notably, Autoscope Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoscope Technologies is 3.69x versus 1.70x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of 39.63% compared to Autoscope Technologies's net margin of --. Autoscope Technologies's return on equity of 26.64% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Autoscope Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 575.68%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Autoscope Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Autoscope Technologies.

Autoscope Technologies has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Autoscope Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoscope Technologies pays 42.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoscope Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoscope Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Autoscope Technologies's net income of $1.3M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Autoscope Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoscope Technologies is 3.69x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 39.63% compared to Autoscope Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. Autoscope Technologies's return on equity of 26.64% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Autoscope Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.14%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Autoscope Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Autoscope Technologies.

Autoscope Technologies has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.21%.

Autoscope Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoscope Technologies pays 42.6% of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoscope Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoscope Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Autoscope Technologies's net income of $1.3M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Autoscope Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while LGL Group's PE ratio is 121.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoscope Technologies is 3.69x versus 17.82x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trimble has a net margin of 39.63% compared to Autoscope Technologies's net margin of 4.64%. Autoscope Technologies's return on equity of 26.64% beat Trimble's return on equity of 4.79%.

Autoscope Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $86.17 which suggests that it could grow by 15.02%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than Autoscope Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than Autoscope Technologies.

Autoscope Technologies has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.491%.

Autoscope Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoscope Technologies pays 42.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoscope Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoscope Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $875.8M. Autoscope Technologies's net income of $1.3M is lower than Trimble's net income of $40.6M. Notably, Autoscope Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Trimble's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoscope Technologies is 3.69x versus 5.10x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.