TRMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Trimble's net margin of -0.35%. Trimble's return on equity of 4.79% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $85.27, signalling upside risk potential of 19.79%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.73%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Trimble has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.882%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $875.8M, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.6M. Trimble's net income of $40.6M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.92x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.76x versus 1.44x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Trimble's net margin of --. Trimble's return on equity of 4.79% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $85.27, signalling upside risk potential of 19.79%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.26%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Trimble.

Trimble has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $875.8M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Trimble's net income of $40.6M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.92x while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.76x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Trimble's net margin of 11.08%. Trimble's return on equity of 4.79% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $85.27, signalling upside risk potential of 19.79%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.33%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Trimble.

Trimble has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.21%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $875.8M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Trimble's net income of $40.6M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.92x while LGL Group's PE ratio is 115.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.76x versus 16.96x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luna Innovations has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Trimble's net margin of --. Trimble's return on equity of 4.79% beat Luna Innovations's return on equity of --.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $85.27, signalling upside risk potential of 19.79%. On the other hand Luna Innovations has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 679.82%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Trimble.

Trimble has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.575%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luna Innovations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luna Innovations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $875.8M, which are larger than Luna Innovations quarterly revenues of --. Trimble's net income of $40.6M is higher than Luna Innovations's net income of --. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.92x while Luna Innovations's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.76x versus 0.32x for Luna Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.