LUNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faro Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of -0.35%. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49%.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 856.02%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.15%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.882%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.6M. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.26x versus 1.46x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of --. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 856.02%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 537.76%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Know Labs, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Know Labs.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.26x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of 11.08%. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 856.02%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.72%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than LGL Group.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.21%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 113.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.26x versus 16.65x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trimble has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of 4.64%. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat Trimble's return on equity of 4.79%.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 856.02%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $85.27 which suggests that it could grow by 21.34%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Trimble.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.491%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $875.8M. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than Trimble's net income of $40.6M. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trimble's PE ratio is 79.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.26x versus 4.70x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.