Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…
Sell
42
KLIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.80
Seasonality move
:
-8.63%
Day range:
$30.79 - $31.19
52-week range:
$27.06 - $42.51
Dividend yield:
39.89%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
24.4K
Avg. volume:
25.9K
1-year change:
-26.96%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
$30.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.64 | 39.89% | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
$25.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.31% | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
$15.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.24% | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
$16.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.12% | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$32.74 | -- | -- | -- | $1.03 | 3.13% | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
$26.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 25.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -0.234 | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | 1.033 | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | 0.469 | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | 1.431 | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.271 | -- | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.760 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or KGRN?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or KGRN More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.382%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or KGRN?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 39.89%. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or KGRN?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or KTEC?
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or KTEC?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or KTEC More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or KTEC?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 39.89%. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or KTEC?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or KURE?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or KURE?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or KURE More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.565%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or KURE?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 39.89%. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or KURE?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or KWEB More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.877%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 39.89%. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or XYLG?
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- XYLGGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or XYLG?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 XYLGGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or XYLG More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or XYLG?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 39.89%. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF offers a yield of 25.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or XYLG?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- XYLGGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…
Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?
Asana stock hasn’t given many investors on Wall Street any…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.
Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.
Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31
Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.
