Where Will Reddit Stock Be In 5 Years?
On a wet March morning last year, the famously orange…
Buy
59
KURE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.84
Seasonality move
:
-1.54%
Day range:
$16.75 - $17.12
52-week range:
$12.91 - $20.51
Dividend yield:
1.05%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
29.6K
Avg. volume:
35.7K
1-year change:
19.7%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
$17.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.05% | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
$26.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.57 | 2.17% | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
$27.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.15% | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
$30.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.59 | 5.34% | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
$55.65 | -- | -- | -- | $1.72 | 2.18% | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
$50.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.70 | 1.77% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | 1.553 | -- | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.521 | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | 0.997 | -- | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.983 | -- | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
-- | 0.364 | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | 0.373 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or CGRO?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or CGRO?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or CGRO More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or CGRO?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or CGRO?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or CNXT?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or CNXT?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck ChiNext ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck ChiNext ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than VanEck ChiNext ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or CNXT More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.813%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or CNXT?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. VanEck ChiNext ETF offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or CNXT?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck ChiNext ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck ChiNext ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or ECNS?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or ECNS?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or ECNS More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.807%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or ECNS?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF offers a yield of 5.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or ECNS?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or EWT?
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or EWT?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or EWT More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.903%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or EWT?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.72 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or EWT?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or FLTW?
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or FLTW?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or FLTW More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.455%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or FLTW?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or FLTW?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Palantir Crash?
AI and data analytics software major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has been…
Is Target’s Dividend Worth Buying?
Retail giant Target (NYSE:TGT) has been through an extremely volatile…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
47
RGC alert for Jun 18
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
20
ENPH alert for Jun 18
Enphase Energy [ENPH] is down 23.99% over the past day.
Sell
26
FSLR alert for Jun 18
First Solar [FSLR] is down 17.97% over the past day.
